IRA Trusts

© 2009 By M. Lorin Castleman, Attorney. All rights reserved.
THE CASTLEMAN LAW FIRM
A Professional Corporation
5870 Stoneridge Mall Rd., Suite 207
Pleasanton, CA 94588
(925) 463-2221
fax: (925) 463-0328
 
Return to Estate Planning Page

Return to Sample Plans Page

RETURN TO HOME PAGE

 

 

SHOULD YOU NAME A TRUST AS THE BENEFICIARY OF YOUR IRA?

If you care about what happens to the funds in your IRA after you die, the answer is definitely “Yes,” so long as you do not use a standard revocable trust.

Naming a properly drafted special IRA Trust as a beneficiary is the only way to provide asset protection and control over the beneficiary’s use and disposition of the IRA assets after the owner-participant’s death, and it is also the only way to guarantee protection of the “income tax stretch” over the beneficiary’s life.

 

The Problems

 

If a special IRA Trust is not used, and an individual is simply named as a direct beneficiary of an IRA, the following “bad things” can occur:

 

If an IRA trust is used, all of these problems can be avoided while, at the same time, achieving maximum tax deferral and asset protection.

 

Conduit and Accumulation IRA Trusts

 

What is the difference between a Conduit Trust IRA Trust and an Accumulation IRA Trust?

A “conduit trust” requires that the required minimum distributions be passed on to the trust beneficiary as they are received by the trust.

In an “accumulation trust,” even though the trust must receive the required minimum distributions, it does not have to pass them on to the beneficiary. It is up to the trustee of the IRA Trust to make that decision.

Which is better?

It depends.  Although a conduit trust can protect the IRA assets that have not been distributed, all distributions that are made to the beneficiary are subject to unwise spending, may be used to feed a habit, and can fall into the hands of his or her his creditors and predators.  Also, those distributions might prevent a disabled beneficiary from receiving governmental assistance.

An accumulation IRA Trust avoids those problems, because the trustee can keep the required minimum distributions in the trust, and out of the hands of the beneficiary or others when appropriate. This means that accumulation IRA Trusts are preferred when there is concern about any of the bullet point problems listed above, or when the greatest asset and spendthrift protection is desired.

If either case the beneficiary’s life expectancy is used for IRA “stretch” purposes provided that the trust is properly designed.

In choosing between the two, keep in mind that we are not talking about protecting the principal, but whether or not you have any concerns about the required minimum distributions flowing immediately into the hands of the beneficiary. Both the conduit trust and the accumulation trust can protect the principal.)

 

Stand-alone IRA Trusts vs. Special Revocable IRA Trusts

 

A normal living trust cannot meet all of the requirements that are necessary to protect the IRA.  Therefore, if separate Stand-alone IRA Trusts are not used, special IRA sub-trust provisions must be drafted into the revocable living trust document. When an accumulation trust is used, there are a number of additional requirements and provisions that must be met, and drafted into the revocable trust document, in order to qualify the revocable living trust for receipt of the IRA proceeds.

A better alternative to adding special IRA trust provisions to a revocable trust is to use a separate “Stand- alone IRA Trust” for each beneficiary, especially if it is an accumulation trust.

The benefits of a separate Stand-alone Accumulation IRA Trust for each beneficiary are:

Conclusions

 

Return to Estate Planning Page

Return to Sample Plans Page

RETURN TO HOME PAGE